Standard crash tests

Tests according to standardized impact tests

As an accredited test laboratory we carry out crash tests in accordance with standards. These include:

  • Testing of road restraint systems

DIN EN 1317-1 (2011-01) - Road restraint systems – Part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods

DIN EN 1317-2 (2011-01) - Road restraint systems – Part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets

DIN EN 1317-3 (2011-01) - Road restraint systems – Part 3: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for crash cushions

DIN CEN/TS 1317-7 (2024-04) - Road restraint systems - Part 7: Performance characterisation and test methods for terminals of safety barriers

DIN CEN/TS 1317-9 (2024-04) - Road restraint systems - Part 9: Impact tests and test methods for removable barrier sections

DIN CEN/TS 1317-10:2023 - Road restraint systems - Part 10: Assessment methods and design guidelines for transitions, terminal and crasg cushion connections - transitions

DIN CEN/TS 16786 (2018-06) - Restraint systems on roads - Transport vehicle-supported mobile impact retarders (TMA) - Performance classes, acceptance criteria for impact tests and test performance

MASH (2016) - Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Second Edition only: Longitudinal Barriers, Terminals and Crash Cushions, Truck- and Trailer-Mounted Attenuators and Variable Message Sign and Arrow Board Trailers

  • Testing of support structures for road equipment

DIN EN 12767 (2019-10) - Passive safety of support structures for road equipment – Requirements, classification and test methods

MASH (2016) - Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Second Editiononly: Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, Breakaway Utility Poles, and Longitudinal Channelizers

  • Testing of vehicle security barrier systems

ASTM F2656/F2656M - 23 (2023) - Standard Test Method for Crash Testing of Vehicle Security Barriers

DIN SPEC 91414-1 (2021-04) - Mobile Fahrzeugsicherheitsbarrieren für Sicherheitsanforderungen - Teil 1: Anforderungen, Prüfmethoden und Leistungskriterien

ISO 22343-1 “Security and resilience - Vehicle security barriers - Part 1: Performance requirement, vehicle impact test method and performance rating”

Technical Guideline (TR) (2019-06) – Mobile Vehicle Security Barriers (version 0.8)

Note: ISO 22343-1 has replaced IWA 14-1 since 2023 and PAS 68 was also withdrawn in 2023.

  • Testing of safety equipment for construction sites

Technische Lieferbedingungen für Leit- und Warnbaken (1997) - Kapitel 4.1 Prüfung der Folien ausgeschlossen

The requirements of a test laboratory correspond in accordance with Article 43 of the Construction Products Regulation for the EN 1317 test methods. In addition, our accreditation by the DAkkS is internationally valid, since the German accreditation body is a member of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC).

Flexible accreditation

Due to the flexible category III accreditation, we can use the free choice of standardized test methods or those that are equivalent to them within the test areas specified above and without requiring prior information and approval from the DAkkS (except EN 1317).

Possible test procedures:

CEN/TS 17342:2019 Road restraint systems - Motorcycle road restraint systems which reduce the impact severity of motorcyclist collisions with safety barriers

ASTM F 3016/F 3016M:2019 - Standard Test Method for Surrogate Testing of Vehicle Impact Protective Devices at Low Speeds

BASt - Sonderlösungen von Schutzeinrichtungen in Einmündungsbereichen (Version 03 vom 23.07.2021)

AS/NZS 3845.2:2017 - Road safety barrier systems and devices Part 2: Road safety devices

BSI PAS 170-1 - Impact testing for vehicle safety barriers - Low speed impact testing Part 1: Test method for bollards using ramming trucks

Withdrawn test procedures:

NCHRP Report 350 - National Cooperative Highway Research Program

MASH 2009 - Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

Manual for the evaluation of safety devices

ASTM F 2656-07 – Test Methods for Impact Testing of Vehicle Safety Barriers (Formerly P1, P2, P3, P4 Rating)

ASTM F2556/F2656M – 15 - Test Methods for Impact Testing of vehicle safety barriers (formerly P1, P2, P3 rating)

ASTM F2656/F2656M – 18 - Test Methods for Impact Testing of Vehicle Safety Barriers (Formerly P1, P2, P3 Rating)

ASTM F2656/F2656M – 18a - Test Methods for Impact Testing of Vehicle Safety Barriers (Formerly P1, P2, P3 Rating)

ASTM F2656/F2656M – 20 - Test Methods for Impact Testing of Vehicle Safety Barriers (Formerly P1, P2, P3 Rating)

CEN CWA 16221:2010 – Vehicle security barriers. Performance requirements, test methods and guidance on application

DoS SD-STD-02.01 – … (Formerly K4, K8, K12 Rating)

IWA 14-1:2013 – Vehicle security barriers - Part 1: Performance requirement, vehicle impact test method and performance rating

PAS 68:2013 – Impact test specifications for vehicle security barrier systems

DIN V ENV 1317-4 (2002-04) - Road restraint systems –Part 4: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for terminals and transitions of safety barriers

Fast and flexible

Our large, easily accessible crash test facility, which can be converted in a very short time, offers the highest spatial and technical flexibility. On the new asphalt surface, construction lengths of up to 170 m are now possible, both for transportable systems and for systems attached to asphalt or concrete foundations.

Clear processing of audit reports

  • Extensive written and digital documentation of the results
  • Multimedia presentation comprehensible for all target groups
  • Direct further use for the corresponding certification and approval processes

Compliance statement and rule of decision

With regard to compliance statements in test reports, the following decision rules have been defined:

As a rule, a low confidence level (A) is assumed, which increases the acceptance range, so that measurement results with a confidence level of at least 50% are also accepted.

After prior agreement, the customer can also specify a medium confidence level (B), which reduces the acceptance range so that measurement results with a confidence level of at least 95% are also accepted with a maximum residual risk of 5%.

A high confidence level (C), which corresponds to a confidence level of at least 99.9%, is not acceptable at the CTS test laboratory and is therefore not applicable.

The confidence level you set (A or B) will be communicated to you via the offer and the test report.

Customized constructive special solutions

  • Push-pull tests
  • Exchangeable bottoms
  • Slopes
  • Strip foundations

For your project

We are well equipped for your project

Construction machinery:

  • Forklift
  • Excavator
  • cherry picker
  • Vibratory feeder

Equipment / Service:

  • Livestreams directly from the crash test facility
  • Office container as workplace directly on the crash site
  • State-of-the-art meeting rooms
  • Catering for you and your customers 
  • Area-wide W-Lan on the crash test site
  • Advertising video production by external film team (http://www.luum.ms)

News

2021-05-07

DIN SPEC 91414-1 - developed with the cooperation of the CTS test laboratory

CTS has actively participated in the development of the DIN SPEC 91414-1 standard for mobile vehicle barriers. Part 1 of the new standard deals with the requirements, test methods and performance criteria of mobile safety barriers. 

DIN SPEC 91414-1 is available for free download from Beuth Verlag at www.beuth.de.

We are looking forward to testing your innovative drive-through barriers soon.

2021-03-22

Successful conversion to the new DIN ISO/IEC 17025:2018 for CTS

2020-05-20

New partners for the simulation of impact tests

Traffic restraint systems often have to be checked for their functionality by dynamic and virtual simulations before the first crash test.

To this end, CTS has been cooperating for some weeks now with EDAG Engineering GmbH and GDTech S.A. "The aim is to offer our customers holistic and, above all, independent solutions, right up to the successful completion of standard tests", says Dipl.-Ing. Peter Schimmelpfennig (Managing Partner of CTS).

Your contact persons

B. Eng. Michel Osterkemper

Head of Technical Department / QMR

+49 (0)2506 / 70 990 83

Kai Schulte

Technical sales

Es wurden keine Ansprechpartner gefunden.

Book your crash appointment easily online!

We look forward to hearing from you.

Let us know your preferred date and your requirements. The CTS team will contact you as soon as possible.

Ja, ich habe die Bedingungen gelesen und akzeptiere sie.

Zum Versenden des Formulars nutzen wir Google reCaptcha, was uns hilft, Spamnachrichten zu vermeiden. Beim Aufruf von Google reCaptcha werden personenbezogene Daten (IP-Adresse) an den Anbieter, die Google Inc. gesendet. Daher ist es möglich, dass Zugriffe gespeichert und ausgewertet werden. Detaillierte Infos finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.